----- Original Message -----
From: Evn Perach
To: Newsweek.com
Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2001 9:12 PM
Subject: "Build More Walls" not a solution for Israel!

Dear Editor

To "Build More Walls", as suggested by Fareed Zakaria in Newsweek of 13 August, 2001, is not a solution for Israel's problems with its Arab population! The reason is the Arab's dependence on Israel for employment. They have to pass through walls into Israel to find jobs. Ironically, however, they bite the hand that feeds them, forcing the closures Israel has to enforce.

The Arab's aggression towards Israel is due to most of them being caught up in the agenda of  Islam, a territorial religion that proliferates by conquering territory and then declaring itself over it. In the process they change the structures of the locals, whether Christian or Jewish into mosques. The most recent example is Joseph's tomb in Shechem. If the Arabs would only behave like the thousands of foreign workers in Israel, viz. Rumanians, Thais, Africans, Filipinos, etc. there could be a chance for peace and prosperity for them in the country.
Evn Perach
Tel Aviv, Israel

Beliefs concerning the God of Israel, Jews, Eretz Israel, Zionism, Arabs, Middle East, Islam
"Belief Statement" undergirding our editrial policy

(Return to Classification)

----- Original Message -----
From: "Evn Perach" <evnperach@yahoo.com>
To: "Jerusalem Post" <editors@jpost.co.il>
Sent: Monday, January 28, 2002 9:21 PM
Subject: Solution in Israel: remove partitions like in RSA

Sir
The solution in South Africa entailed the removal of all borders between ethnic groups, exactly the opposite of what leftist and globalist Jews aim to achieve in the territory mandated to the Jews for a homeland. Ironically, on the other hand, an elimination of partitions and an undivided Palestine, is exactly what the Arabs aim to achieve ultimately via the peace they try to negotiate with whatever Jewish conspirator they can find.

The solution for Israel will actually eventually prove to be a territory without partitions, where Jews and Arabs can live together in peace. It will be called the State of Israel, that will be ruled by Jews and provide for Arabs what they need, namely, employment and a future -- better than what any Arab country can ever offer them. Since Islam and Islamic structures like mosques and phallic towers (minarets) give rise to suicidal maniacs (what Shimon Peres has called them on occasion), they will have to go without it, or go and live in countries where Islam might still be welcome.

The present situation also shows that democracy doesn't work for Arabs and that they cannot be trusted with money or arms and ammunition. They will therefore need to be limited to autonomy on a local level with fiscal accountability and Israel will have to take sole responsibility everywhere for security and crime prevention. Arabs and other foreigners will, of course, be allowed to own land, but only for periods stipulated in Mosaic Law. The strict Biblical rules concerning fair treatment of foreigners (aliens) will also need to be enforced.

Evn Perach
Jerusalem

(Return to Classification)

-
----- Original Message -----
From: holyland-inc.net
To: alt.christnet.bible,alt.politics.religion,alt.religion.judaism,soc.culture.jewish
Sent: Monday, June 11, 2001 8:14 PM
Subject: Israel may not negotiate, Islam not Abrahamic

Re: An appeal of the Interreligious Coordination Council in Israel, in cooperation with the Three Faiths Forum of the UK, to religious and Political leaders in an advertisement in the JPost Friday 1 June.

They said:
"As men and women of faith, affiliated with the three Abrahamic religions in Israel - Judaism, Christianity and Islam - we address this appeal to religious and political leaders on both sides of the conflict because we are concerned about the escalating spiral of violence in the region, with a growing number of injured and dead..."

I wrote to them:
Dear well-meaning Friends Please forgive me for having to point out to you that your efforts for peace will not work due to the following basics regarding religions and the will of the gods:

  1. Jews and Christians among you should know that we are living in the time of which the Bible says emphatically: "They dress the wound of my people as though it were not serious. 'Peace, peace,' they say, when there is no peace." (Jeremiah 6:14)
    Even the Egyptian, Edward Said, has said: "There is no 'new peace between old enemies."

  2. Jews and Christians among you should know that one of the PERMANENT LAWS given to Moses during his 40 days on the mountain was not to negotiate with the people living in the Promised Land - make a peace treaty with them. Consequently the nations that occupied the lands promised to them have altogether disappeared. They were the Hittites, Girgashites, Amorites, Canaanites, Perizzites, Hivites and Jebusites - "seven nations larger and stronger than you." (Deuteronomy 7:1).
    The land "mandated" to the Jews in this century, is that very same land Promised to them as an eternal heritage. One can therefore ask, "What chance do the Palestinians have?" - they are not even a nation!

  3. Jews and Christians among you should know that the Promised Land (to the Jews) may not be divided. See: Joel 3:2 I will gather all nations and bring them down to the Valley of Jehoshaphat. There I will enter into judgment against them concerning my inheritance, my people Israel, for they scattered my people among the nations and divided up my land.

  4. We have to do with different gods since the God of Israel and the God of Islam are different Gods. Just ask yourselves, "If they were the same God, why did he let the Jews win in all the major wars against the Arabs since 1948? A bit unfair isn't it? Fact is, Mohammad spoke to another God than the God of Abraham and Israel, a God who says emphatically, "I don't have a son..."  He can therefore not be ELOHIM like the God of Israel, a multiple person, in whose image humans were created as multiple persons - body, soul and spirit.

The God of Islam is therefore not the God who appeared and spoke to Abraham in person, since he doesn't have a human body (Messiah - the Son) to appear in on earth. The God of Islam, in any case, only surfaced and introduced himself (to Mohammad) some 3,000 years later. He is therefore a foreign god in Israel and is causing immense problems in the process of asserting control over the land.

The only way to get peace in the land "mandated" to the Jews, is therefore to remove the structures of the God of Islam from it since they are used to proclaim Islam over the land and to incite the Muslims to drive the Jews from the land. What other way is there in any case to retaliate against Islamic fundamentalists than to attack Islam itself, since killing Muslim extremists makes martyrs out of them and encourages their peers to be indoctrinated into aspiring to also die for Allah - to enjoy all those virgins -- how is a mystery, because they leave their human bodies with their sex organs behind on earth!

Biblically the Arabs in Israel should be treated fairly, but as foreigners -as long as they recognize the rights of the Jews and don't serve foreign gods - e.g. also Tamuz represented by the crescent on the Islamic flag

Enough said. May you be blessed as you recognize the sovereignty of the God of Israel over the land he'd given to the descendants of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.

Yours sincerely
Evn Perach

(Return to Classification)

Allah is not the same god as Elohim of Israel!!!!!!!

Psalm 81:9 You shall have no foreign god among you...!!


----- Original Message -----
From: "Evn Perach" <evnperach@yahoo.com>
To: <iht@iht.com>
Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 9:41 PM
Subject: South Africa not a good example of negotiated peace

South African flag

Dear Editor
Using the South African (SA) transition to democracy as an example of the possibility of reaching negotiated settlements, once again reflects the short-sightedness and irresponsibility of the Israeli leftist, humanist, agnostic, peace camp. On the longer term even a relative peace settlement that may be negotiated in Israel will not last for exactly the same reasons “calm” hasn’t been sustainable in SA, namely the nationalistic and religious agendas that were the ultimate goals of the blacks and Muslims in SA and the Arabs in and outside Israel. In SA, the nationalistic goal of the blacks is exactly the same as that of President Mugabi of Zimbabwe, namely to disown white landowners. For that reason hardly any criticism of Mugabi’s agenda has so far come from the ruling SA ANC party.

Could common agendas be why criticism of Arafat has yet to emanate from “see-no-evil” Peres, Beilin and others? For one thing, I understand that Peres and Arafat are both advanced level Freemasons. Actually, I think these Jewish leftists’ global agenda is too important for them to care about the nationalistic goal of the Arabs to push the Jews into the Mediterranean Sea. In SA the tenacious clinging of a minority of rightwing whites to their nationalistic aspirations petered out in the democratic process. In Israel, however, it will not happen, since a majority of Jewish voters share the concerns of the rightwing. Latest polls, for instance, show that 64.3% of the Israelis don’t believe that peace with security is attainable. For that reason Israeli politicians try to satisfy their international globalist bosses by trying to sneak settlements past the democratic process in a “zbang vgamarnu” fashion. Well, PM Arial Sharon will bite the dust like PM Barak, should he try to be underhanded with “painful concessions!” He was in any case not elected to negotiate, but to restore security.
In SA the Islamic agenda was effected in a covert way by Muslims “worming” their way into prominent government positions by joining the ANC.

Contrary to that, Islam is everything but covert in the Hamites’ agenda in the Middle East. In fact, it’s more important than nationalism. Islamic aspirations were probably the reason why Arafat couldn’t accept PM Barak’s suicidal offers at Camp David. Perhaps his heart was just hardened like that of Pharaoh in his negotiations with Moses and Aaron – an answer to the prayers of millions who know that Ishmael is again trying to muscle in on Isaac’s inheritance.

Evn Perach
Jerusalem

(Return to Classification)

ME Oil "None of the Gulf oil states have succeeded in diversifying their economies away from oil"
----- Original Message -----
From: "Evn Perach" <
evnperach@yahoo.com>
To: "American Muslim Council" <
faiz@amconline.org>
Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 7:14 PM
Subject: Saudi peace plan for Israel

Saudi conspiracy to accomplish Phase 1 of the "phased" plan to push the Jews out of their inheritance

Dear Mr. Rehman
I would like to point out that this Saudi peace plan is just another version of the "phased" plan of the Arabs in Israel to, [1] get a state on part of the land west of the Jordan, [2] and then the rest.

Meanwhile, however, nothing has happened since 1920** that gives the Arabs in Israel any legal claim to land west of the Jordan River. Actually, the British Colonial Office, headed by Winston Churchill, had no right to exclude Trans-Jordan in 1922, some 78% of "Palestine," from the provisions of the Mandate pertaining to the "Jewish National Home."

**Decisions of the Allied Supreme Council at San Remo, Italy in 1920, in accordance with the Balfour Declaration of November 2, 1917, turned the right of the Jewish people over Palestine into a right recognized by international law.

The reason for Arabs not having any claim to land west of the Jordan, is that they have never signed any agreement that gives them such rights. They rejected two international proposals to partition the country into Jewish and Arab polities, by the British Peel commission in 1937 and by the UN general assembly in November 1947. In 1948, the State of Israel declared its independence within the framework of United Nations resolutions. This was rejected by the Arab people and, as a result of the ensuing War of Independence (at a high toll), Israel's borders expanded from the Arab-rejected proposed partition line to what became known as the "Green Line." The area from the Green Line to the Jordan River and the area of the Gaza Strip remained in flux as (while they were occupied by neighboring Arab states) there was no internationally recognized annexation of the lands. Then, of course Yasser Arafat rejected Ehud Barak's offer at Camp David, which proves that they will only settle for all the land west of the Jordan - not that the Hashemites in Jordan will be spared attempts to take over their Kingdom.

The concept of Israel "occupying" Arab land in Israel, is therefore nothing more than a media gimmick.

Furthermore, is the story that the Jews and the Moslems have the same God, also devoid from reality. Talking about the three monotheistic religions is Biblically unsustainable, the G-d of Israel himself said, "let US make man in our image...!" It's true, he is ONE, but a multiple ONE, he has a SON or a body also symbolized by Abraham's ram in the bush. Even His Spirit is 7-fold! In contrast El (Allah) of Islam says emphatically, "I don't have a son!" In other words, he is just a spirit represented by a rock in Mecca.
His prophet, Mohammad also doesn't qualify to be a prophet of the G-d of Israel.

Israel's strategy should therefore be to ban the religion that produces suicide bombers rather than to go after terrorists - like Pres. Bush.

I'm sorry to have to spell out harsh reality.
Yours sincerely,
Evn Perach
Jerusalem

(Return to Classification)

NO  Islam, NO Alluhu akbar shouting suicidal maniacs!!!

Islam is the common denomitor between suicide bombers