| -----
Original Message ----- From: Evn Perach To: Newsweek.com Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2001 9:12 PM Subject: "Build More Walls" not a solution for Israel! Dear Editor To "Build More Walls", as suggested by Fareed Zakaria in Newsweek of 13 August, 2001, is not a solution for Israel's problems with its Arab population! The reason is the Arab's dependence on Israel for employment. They have to pass through walls into Israel to find jobs. Ironically, however, they bite the hand that feeds them, forcing the closures Israel has to enforce.
The Arab's aggression towards
Israel is due to most of them being caught up in the agenda of Islam,
a territorial religion that proliferates by conquering territory and then
declaring itself over it. In the process they change the structures of the
locals, whether Christian or Jewish into mosques. The most recent example
is Joseph's tomb in Shechem. If the Arabs would only behave like the thousands
of foreign workers in Israel, viz. Rumanians, Thais, Africans, Filipinos,
etc. there could be a chance for peace and prosperity for them in the
country. |
||||
![]() |
|
|||
| ----- Original
Message ----- From: "Evn Perach" <evnperach@yahoo.com> To: "Jerusalem Post" <editors@jpost.co.il> Sent: Monday, January 28, 2002 9:21 PM Subject: Solution in Israel: remove partitions like in RSA Sir The solution in South Africa entailed the removal of all borders between ethnic groups, exactly the opposite of what leftist and globalist Jews aim to achieve in the territory mandated to the Jews for a homeland. Ironically, on the other hand, an elimination of partitions and an undivided Palestine, is exactly what the Arabs aim to achieve ultimately via the peace they try to negotiate with whatever Jewish conspirator they can find. The solution for Israel will actually eventually prove to be a territory without partitions, where Jews and Arabs can live together in peace. It will be called the State of Israel, that will be ruled by Jews and provide for Arabs what they need, namely, employment and a future -- better than what any Arab country can ever offer them. Since Islam and Islamic structures like mosques and phallic towers (minarets) give rise to suicidal maniacs (what Shimon Peres has called them on occasion), they will have to go without it, or go and live in countries where Islam might still be welcome. The present situation also shows that democracy doesn't work for Arabs and that they cannot be trusted with money or arms and ammunition. They will therefore need to be limited to autonomy on a local level with fiscal accountability and Israel will have to take sole responsibility everywhere for security and crime prevention. Arabs and other foreigners will, of course, be allowed to own land, but only for periods stipulated in Mosaic Law. The strict Biblical rules concerning fair treatment of foreigners (aliens) will also need to be enforced. |
||||
| Evn Perach Jerusalem |
(Return to Classification) |
|||
| - ----- Original Message ----- From: holyland-inc.net To: alt.christnet.bible,alt.politics.religion,alt.religion.judaism,soc.culture.jewish Sent: Monday, June 11, 2001 8:14 PM Subject: Israel may not negotiate, Islam not Abrahamic Re: An appeal of the Interreligious Coordination Council in Israel, in cooperation with the Three Faiths Forum of the UK, to religious and Political leaders in an advertisement in the JPost Friday 1 June. They said: "As men and women of faith, affiliated with the three Abrahamic religions in Israel - Judaism, Christianity and Islam - we address this appeal to religious and political leaders on both sides of the conflict because we are concerned about the escalating spiral of violence in the region, with a growing number of injured and dead..."
I wrote to them:
The God of Islam is
therefore not the God who appeared and spoke to Abraham in person, since
he doesn't have a human body (Messiah - the Son) to appear in on earth. The
God of Islam, in any case, only surfaced and introduced himself (to Mohammad)
some 3,000 years later. He is therefore a foreign god in Israel and is causing
immense problems in the process of asserting control over the land. |
||||
| Yours
sincerely Evn Perach |
(Return to Classification) |
|||
![]() |
Psalm 81:9 You shall have no foreign god among you...!! |
|||
----- Original Message ----- From: "Evn Perach" <evnperach@yahoo.com> To: <iht@iht.com> Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 9:41 PM Subject: South Africa not a good example of negotiated peace |
|
|||
Dear Editor
Could common agendas
be why criticism of Arafat has yet to emanate from see-no-evil
Peres, Beilin and others? For one thing, I understand that Peres and Arafat
are both advanced level Freemasons. Actually, I think these Jewish
leftists global agenda is too important for them to care about the
nationalistic goal of the Arabs to push the Jews into the Mediterranean Sea.
In SA the tenacious clinging of a minority of rightwing whites to their
nationalistic aspirations petered out in the democratic process. In Israel,
however, it will not happen, since a majority of Jewish voters share the
concerns of the rightwing. Latest polls, for instance, show that 64.3% of
the Israelis dont believe that peace with security is attainable. For
that reason Israeli politicians try to satisfy their international globalist
bosses by trying to sneak settlements past the democratic process in a
zbang vgamarnu fashion. Well, PM Arial Sharon will bite the dust
like PM Barak, should he try to be underhanded with painful
concessions! He was in any case not elected to negotiate, but to restore
security. Contrary to that, Islam is everything but covert in the Hamites agenda in the Middle East. In fact, its more important than nationalism. Islamic aspirations were probably the reason why Arafat couldnt accept PM Baraks suicidal offers at Camp David. Perhaps his heart was just hardened like that of Pharaoh in his negotiations with Moses and Aaron an answer to the prayers of millions who know that Ishmael is again trying to muscle in on Isaacs inheritance. |
||||
| Evn Perach Jerusalem |
(Return to Classification) |
|||
![]() |
"None of the Gulf oil states have succeeded in diversifying their economies away from oil" | |||
| -----
Original Message ----- From: "Evn Perach" <evnperach@yahoo.com> To: "American Muslim Council" <faiz@amconline.org> Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 7:14 PM Subject: Saudi peace plan for Israel |
|
|||
| Dear
Mr. Rehman I would like to point out that this Saudi peace plan is just another version of the "phased" plan of the Arabs in Israel to, [1] get a state on part of the land west of the Jordan, [2] and then the rest. Meanwhile, however, nothing has happened since 1920** that gives the Arabs in Israel any legal claim to land west of the Jordan River. Actually, the British Colonial Office, headed by Winston Churchill, had no right to exclude Trans-Jordan in 1922, some 78% of "Palestine," from the provisions of the Mandate pertaining to the "Jewish National Home." **Decisions of the Allied Supreme Council at San Remo, Italy in 1920, in accordance with the Balfour Declaration of November 2, 1917, turned the right of the Jewish people over Palestine into a right recognized by international law. The reason for Arabs not having any claim to land west of the Jordan, is that they have never signed any agreement that gives them such rights. They rejected two international proposals to partition the country into Jewish and Arab polities, by the British Peel commission in 1937 and by the UN general assembly in November 1947. In 1948, the State of Israel declared its independence within the framework of United Nations resolutions. This was rejected by the Arab people and, as a result of the ensuing War of Independence (at a high toll), Israel's borders expanded from the Arab-rejected proposed partition line to what became known as the "Green Line." The area from the Green Line to the Jordan River and the area of the Gaza Strip remained in flux as (while they were occupied by neighboring Arab states) there was no internationally recognized annexation of the lands. Then, of course Yasser Arafat rejected Ehud Barak's offer at Camp David, which proves that they will only settle for all the land west of the Jordan - not that the Hashemites in Jordan will be spared attempts to take over their Kingdom. The concept of Israel "occupying" Arab land in Israel, is therefore nothing more than a media gimmick. Furthermore, is the story that the Jews and the Moslems have the same God, also devoid from reality. Talking about the three monotheistic religions is Biblically unsustainable, the G-d of Israel himself said, "let US make man in our image...!" It's true, he is ONE, but a multiple ONE, he has a SON or a body also symbolized by Abraham's ram in the bush. Even His Spirit is 7-fold! In contrast El (Allah) of Islam says emphatically, "I don't have a son!" In other words, he is just a spirit represented by a rock in Mecca. His prophet, Mohammad also doesn't qualify to be a prophet of the G-d of Israel. Israel's strategy should therefore be to ban the religion that produces suicide bombers rather than to go after terrorists - like Pres. Bush. I'm sorry to have to spell out harsh reality. |
||||
| Yours sincerely, Evn Perach Jerusalem |
(Return to Classification) |
|||
|
Islam is the common denomitor between suicide bombers | |||